Yamaha XJ6 Diversion 2009 vs. Honda CBF 1000 2006
Yamaha XJ6 Diversion 2009
Honda CBF 1000 2006
Přehled - Yamaha XJ6 Diversion 2009 vs Honda CBF 1000 2006
The Yamaha XJ6 Diversion model year 2009 and the Honda CBF 1000 model year 2006 are both sport touring motorcycles that offer a balance between performance and comfort.
In terms of engine power, the Honda CBF 1000 has a higher output with 98 HP compared to the Yamaha XJ6 Diversion's 78 HP. This means that the Honda CBF 1000 may offer better acceleration and top speed capabilities.
Both motorcycles have a chain transmission and feature 4 cylinders and 4-stroke engines. However, the Yamaha XJ6 Diversion has a smaller displacement of 600ccm compared to the Honda CBF 1000's 998ccm. This suggests that the Honda CBF 1000 may have more torque and overall power delivery.
Yamaha XJ6 Diversion 2009
When it comes to dimensions and weights, the Honda CBF 1000 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1483mm compared to the Yamaha XJ6 Diversion's 1440mm. This may result in better stability and handling for the Honda CBF 1000. The seat height is similar for both motorcycles, with the Yamaha XJ6 Diversion measuring at 785mm and the Honda CBF 1000 at 780mm.
In terms of weight, the Honda CBF 1000 is slightly heavier with a dry weight of 228kg compared to the Yamaha XJ6 Diversion's 211kg. This may affect the maneuverability and agility of the Honda CBF 1000.
The fuel tank capacity is also slightly larger for the Honda CBF 1000, with a capacity of 19 liters compared to the Yamaha XJ6 Diversion's 17.3 liters. This may result in a longer range for the Honda CBF 1000 before needing to refuel.
Honda CBF 1000 2006
In terms of strengths, the Yamaha XJ6 Diversion 2009 offers rider-friendly performance characteristics, optimal clutch, playful handling, seat comfort, individual look, main stand, and increased riding comfort. On the other hand, the Honda CBF 1000 2006 has well-functioning, merciful brakes and a quiet, smooth but relatively powerful engine that enables driving concentration.
However, the Yamaha XJ6 Diversion 2009 has some weaknesses, including design components that are not too demanding and torque development. On the other hand, the Honda CBF 1000 2006 has a neat but unspectacular chassis and lean angle clearance that quickly reaches its limit with a sporty riding style.
In conclusion, the Yamaha XJ6 Diversion 2009 and the Honda CBF 1000 2006 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha XJ6 Diversion may offer a more comfortable and individualized riding experience, while the Honda CBF 1000 may provide better performance and handling capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technické údaje Yamaha XJ6 Diversion 2009 ve srovnání s Honda CBF 1000 2006
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Yamaha XJ6 Diversion 2009
Kromě poloviční skořápky nabízí XJ6 Diversion také hlavní stojan. Celkově působí solidním dojmem. Barvy mu sluší a při delších výletech mu nic nestojí v cestě. Jízdní komfort je díky ochraně proti větru samozřejmě vyšší než u modelu XJ6. To je patrné zejména při vyšších rychlostech.
Honda CBF 1000 2006
Součet neokázalých detailů dává dohromady dokonale vyvážený motocykl. Milovníci evropských motocyklů by si mohli pomyslet: "Příliš sterilní, příliš málo charakteru". CBF nemůže a ani nechce vytlačit z garáže Tuono, Monstera nebo MV. Šťastného majitele vytlačí z garáže na asfalt každý den.
Srovnání cen průměrná tržní cena Yamaha XJ6 Diversion vs Honda CBF 1000
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XJ6 Diversion 2009 and a Honda CBF 1000 2006. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XJ6 Diversion with 54 days compared to 60 days for a Honda CBF 1000. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 4 reviews for the Yamaha XJ6 Diversion and 7 reviews for the Honda CBF 1000 since model year 2006. The first review for the Yamaha XJ6 Diversion was published on 9/8/2008 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 53,200 views for the first review on Honda CBF 1000 published on 5/16/2006.
