Honda CB650F 2014 vs. Yamaha XJ6 2009
Honda CB650F 2014
Yamaha XJ6 2009
Přehled - Honda CB650F 2014 vs Yamaha XJ6 2009
In comparing the Honda CB650F 2014 and the Yamaha XJ6 2009, there are several key differences to consider.
Starting with the technical specifications, the Honda CB650F has a more powerful engine with 87 HP compared to the Yamaha XJ6's 78 HP. The Honda also has a higher torque of 63 Nm compared to the Yamaha's 59.7 Nm. Both bikes have 4 cylinders and liquid cooling systems. However, the Honda has a larger displacement of 649 ccm compared to the Yamaha's 600 ccm.
Honda CB650F 2014
In terms of the chassis, both bikes have a steel frame and double disk brakes at the front. They also have the same front and rear tire diameters of 17 inches. The Honda has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450 mm compared to the Yamaha's 1440 mm. The seat height of the Honda is also slightly higher at 810 mm compared to the Yamaha's 785 mm. Both bikes have the same fuel tank capacity of 17.3 liters.
Moving on to the strengths of each bike, the Honda CB650F has excellent braking capabilities, allowing for confident and safe maneuvering. It also has a sporty appearance that is visually appealing and stands out on the road. Additionally, the Honda offers an upright and comfortable seating position, making it suitable for longer rides.
On the other hand, the Yamaha XJ6 has several strengths of its own. It offers rider-friendly performance characteristics, providing a smooth and enjoyable riding experience. The clutch on the Yamaha is also optimal, allowing for easy and precise gear changes. The bike has a playful and lighter handling, making it nimble and agile on the road. The seat comfort is also worth noting, ensuring a comfortable ride for the rider. Furthermore, the Yamaha has an individual look with a young and aggressive design, giving it a unique and stylish appearance. The build quality of the Yamaha is also high-quality, ensuring durability and longevity.
Yamaha XJ6 2009
In terms of weaknesses, the Honda CB650F does not have any specific weaknesses mentioned. On the other hand, the Yamaha XJ6 has some weaknesses highlighted. The design components of the Yamaha are not too demanding, suggesting that it may not have the same level of visual appeal as the Honda. Additionally, the torque development of the Yamaha may not be as strong as the Honda, potentially impacting its acceleration and overall performance.
In conclusion, the Honda CB650F 2014 and the Yamaha XJ6 2009 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Honda offers excellent braking, a sporty appearance, and a comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the Yamaha provides rider-friendly performance, optimal clutch, playful handling, seat comfort, an individual look, and high-quality construction. Ultimately, the choice between the two bikes will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technické údaje Honda CB650F 2014 ve srovnání s Yamaha XJ6 2009
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Honda CB650F 2014
Vzhled je zdařilý, brzdy překvapivě výkonné, podvozek je bezvadným kompromisem a motor plynulým a jistým společníkem. Za tuto soudržnou a kvalitní kombinaci je zaváděcí cena necelých 8 000 eur přijatelná.
Yamaha XJ6 2009
Navzdory společnému základu působí XJ mnohem mladším a agresivnějším dojmem. Motocykl střední třídy, který v žádném případě nevyvolává pocit střední třídy. Až na kyvnou vidlici působí motocykl poměrně kvalitně a chladně. Motocykl se ovládá o něco snadněji než Diversion.
Srovnání cen průměrná tržní cena Honda CB650F vs Yamaha XJ6
There are a few key differences between a Honda CB650F 2014 and a Yamaha XJ6 2009. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XJ6 with 31 days compared to 45 days for the Honda CB650F. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 14 reviews for the Honda CB650F and 4 reviews for the Yamaha XJ6 since model year 2009. The first review for the Honda CB650F was published on 11/4/2013 and now has more than 14,100 views. This compares to more than 21,900 views for the first review on Yamaha XJ6 published on 11/13/2008.