MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016

MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Loading...

Overview - MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

In terms of engine power, the MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016 has a power output of 115 HP, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has a higher power output of 123 HP. This gives the Triumph a slight advantage in terms of overall performance.

In terms of torque, the MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016 has a torque of 84 Nm, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has a slightly lower torque of 77 Nm. This means that the MV Agusta has a slight advantage in terms of low-end power and acceleration.

Both bikes have 3 cylinders and a similar displacement, with the MV Agusta having a displacement of 798 ccm and the Triumph having a displacement of 765 ccm. This means that both bikes have a similar engine setup and should provide a similar riding experience in terms of engine characteristics.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, the MV Agusta uses Marzocchi suspension while the Triumph uses Showa suspension. Both brands are well-known for their quality and performance, so it ultimately comes down to personal preference.

MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016

MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016

For the rear suspension, the MV Agusta has a single swing arm with Marzocchi suspension, while the Triumph has a swing arm with Öhlins suspension. Again, both brands are reputable and provide good performance, so it comes down to personal preference.

In terms of the chassis, both bikes have an aluminum frame. However, the MV Agusta has a tubular frame type, while the Triumph has a twin tube frame type. This may result in slight differences in handling and overall feel, but it is unlikely to be a major factor in the riding experience.

Both bikes have Brembo brakes with four pistons at the front. The Triumph has the additional advantage of having radial, monoblock technology, which can provide better braking performance. However, both bikes should have excellent stopping power and braking performance overall.

In terms of rider assistance systems, both bikes have advanced systems such as ride by wire and quickshifter. The Triumph also has additional features such as ABS, riding modes, and traction control. These additional features can enhance the overall riding experience and provide added safety and control.

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar front and rear tire widths and diameters. The MV Agusta has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1380 mm compared to the Triumph's 1410 mm. The seat height is also slightly lower on the MV Agusta at 810 mm compared to the Triumph's 825 mm. Both bikes have a similar dry weight with ABS, with the MV Agusta weighing 167 kg and the Triumph weighing 166 kg. The Triumph also has a slightly larger fuel tank capacity of 17.4 liters compared to the MV Agusta's 16.6 liters.

In terms of strengths, the MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016 has a smooth and precise automatic gearshift up and down, a very tight chassis with lots of feedback, and a rev-happy three-cylinder engine with a great husky sound. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has a wonderfully sporty engine, a quickshifter as standard, a throaty sound, an excellent braking system, ABS and traction control as standard and can be switched off, cool looks, and a low weight.

In terms of weaknesses, the MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016 has a throttle response and responsiveness that can be a little rough and a touch too direct in "Sport" mode. The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has a complicated menu navigation, which may be a downside for riders who prefer a simpler interface.

Overall, both the MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 are excellent naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two ultimately comes down to personal preference in terms of styling, brand loyalty, and specific features that are important to the individual rider.

Technical Specifications MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
Show all
Same only
Differences
MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016
MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandShowa

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSingle swing armSuspensionSwing arm
BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandÖhlins

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsRide by Wire, QuickshifterAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,085 mmLength2,065 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,380 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height825 mm
Dry Weight (with ABS)Dry Weight (with ABS)167 kgDry Weight (with ABS)166 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.6 lFuel Tank Capacity17.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016

MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016

Very sharp, naked sports machine with killer charisma.

Smooth and precise automatic gearshift up and down

very tight chassis with lots of feedback, rev-happy three-cylinder with a great husky sound

Throttle response and responsiveness a little rough and a touch too direct in "Sport" mode

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

The top model among the Street Triples fully deserves the designation. Sportier in all respects than the R version, the RS presents itself on the country road as a fun machine that has few opponents to fear. Trackdays on the racetrack are also an issue, especially since the engine is very sharp, the Brembo brakes are super-sporty and the suspension with the Öhlins damper is wonderfully precise. The handling is a stunner anyway, the Street Triple is still the lightest in its class. The standard quickshifter further consolidates the position of the top model.

wonderfully sporty engine

quickshifter as standard

throaty sound

excellent braking system

ABS and traction control as standard and can be switched off

cool looks

low weight

complicated menu navigation

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price MV Agusta Brutale 800 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

There are a few key differences between a MV Agusta Brutale 800 2016 and a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS with 67 days compared to 177 days for the MV Agusta Brutale 800. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 8 reviews for the MV Agusta Brutale 800 and 26 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS since model year 2017. The first review for the MV Agusta Brutale 800 was published on 11/6/2012 and now has more than 25,800 views. This compares to more than 58,400 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 765 RS published on 1/10/2017.

Price MV Agusta Brutale 800

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen