Yamaha XSR900 2018 vs. Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016

Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha XSR900 2018 vs Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016

The Yamaha XSR900 2018 and the Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016 are both naked bikes with their own unique features and strengths.

Starting with the Yamaha XSR900 2018, it is equipped with a powerful in-line engine that produces 115 horsepower and 87.5 Nm of torque. With its three cylinders and liquid cooling system, it offers a high-performance riding experience. The suspension system consists of an upside-down telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear, providing stability and control. The frame is made of aluminum and has a twin tube design, ensuring durability and strength. The braking system includes double disk brakes at the front with a diameter of 298 mm, offering excellent stopping power. Additionally, it features advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS for enhanced safety. The dimensions and weights of the XSR900 include a front tire width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, a rear tire width of 180 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, a wheelbase of 1440 mm, a seat height of 815 mm, a kerb weight of 191 kg (with ABS), and a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters.

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

On the other hand, the Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016 has a V-type engine with 55 horsepower and 62 Nm of torque. With its two cylinders and oil-air cooling system, it offers a comfortable and smooth ride. The suspension system consists of a telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear, providing a comfortable and stable ride. The frame is made of steel and has a double cradle design, ensuring stability and durability. The braking system includes a single disk brake at the front with a diameter of 320 mm, offering reliable stopping power. In addition to ABS, the V9 Roamer also features traction control for added safety. The dimensions and weights of the V9 Roamer include a front tire width of 100 mm and a diameter of 19 inches, a rear tire width of 150 mm and a diameter of 16 inches, a wheelbase of 1480 mm, a seat height of 775 mm, a kerb weight of 200 kg (with ABS), and a fuel tank capacity of 15 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha XSR900 2018 stands out with its extremely sporty and rev-happy engine, excellent brakes, and a riding experience that matches the level of a naked bike. It also offers a pleasant seating position, high-quality workmanship, and a good price-performance ratio. On the other hand, the Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016 excels in terms of its comfortable chassis, comfortable seating position, stable brakes, and attractive design.

Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016

Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016

However, the Yamaha XSR900 2018 does have some weaknesses, such as an almost too direct response from the engine and a retro style that may not be thought through to the last detail. On the other hand, the Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016 could benefit from a slightly stronger engine.

In conclusion, both the Yamaha XSR900 2018 and the Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016 offer their own unique features and strengths. The XSR900 provides a more sporty and performance-oriented riding experience, while the V9 Roamer offers a comfortable and stylish option. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR900 2018 compared to Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2018
Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016
Show all
Same only
Differences
Yamaha XSR900 2018
Yamaha XSR900 2018
Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016
Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeV
BoreBore78 mmBore84 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke77 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power55 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power6,250 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque62 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque3,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio10.5
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeToughened
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionProp shaft
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder2
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingOil-air
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement853 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
TravelTravel137 mmTravel130 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel130 mmTravel97 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle
RakeRake65 degreeRake63.4 degree
TrailTrail103 mmTrail125.1 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk
DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter320 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter260 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width100 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter16 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,134 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth722 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,480 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height775 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)191 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)200 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

The Yamaha XSR900 is a classic optical illusion - with its round headlight, angular tank and attached tail light, it clearly passes for a retro bike. But it's no coincidence that the performance is reminiscent of the potent mid-range naked bike Yamaha MT-09, which is the extremely sporty basis for the XSR900. So the engine is a blast and the brakes are appropriately venomous. Fortunately, the engineers didn't overdo it with the chassis, the XSR900 offers sufficient comfort and the upright riding position is more comfortable than the powerful engine would lead one to expect. All in all, the XSR900 is one of the sportiest models among the retro bikes.

Extremely sporty and rev-happy engine

excellent brakes

riding at naked bike level

pleasant seating position

high-quality workmanship

price-performance ratio.

almost too direct response

retro style not thought through to the last detail

Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016

Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016

The V9 Roamer (masculine, means wanderer, vagabond) has a legacy to take up in contrast to the V9 Bobber - it replaces the Moto Guzzi Nevada 750. This makes it clear that the Roamer should also work on longer distances. Accordingly, the seating position is cosy, the high handlebars, the pleasant knee angle and the comfortable saddle provide a distinctly feel-good atmosphere. Thanks to its low weight of only 200 kilos, the Roamer also has more agile handling than you would expect from a cruiser. However, the typical V2 engine with its 55 hp is more for cruising than for sport.

Comfortable chassis

comfortable seating position

stable brakes

nice look

the engine could be a little stronger

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XSR900 vs Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2018 and a Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer 2016. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 4. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 123 days compared to 144 days for a Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 5 reviews for the Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer since model year 2016. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 11/25/2015 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 37,200 views for the first review on Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer published on 3/17/2016.

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen