Benelli 502 C 2020 vs. Suzuki SV 650 2021

Benelli 502 C 2020

Benelli 502 C 2020

Suzuki SV 650 2021

Suzuki SV 650 2021

Loading...

Overview - Benelli 502 C 2020 vs Suzuki SV 650 2021

The Benelli 502 C 2020 and the Suzuki SV 650 2021 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, fuel systems, and cooling systems. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Suzuki SV 650 2021 has a significant advantage with 73 HP compared to the Benelli 502 C 2020's 48 HP. The Suzuki also has a higher torque of 64 Nm compared to the Benelli's 45 Nm. This means that the Suzuki will likely offer better acceleration and overall performance.

Both bikes have a 2-cylinder engine configuration and utilize liquid cooling. The Benelli has a displacement of 500ccm, while the Suzuki has a larger displacement of 645ccm. This larger displacement may contribute to the Suzuki's higher power and torque figures.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature a swing arm rear suspension with a monoshock absorber and preload adjustment. However, the Benelli 502 C 2020 has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension, while the Suzuki SV 650 2021 has a conventional telescopic fork front suspension. The upside-down fork on the Benelli may provide better handling and stability.

Benelli 502 C 2020

Benelli 502 C 2020

Both bikes have a steel frame with a tubular design, ensuring a sturdy and reliable chassis. The braking systems on both bikes consist of double disk front brakes with four pistons. However, the Suzuki SV 650 2021 has larger front brake disks with a diameter of 290mm compared to the Benelli's 280mm disks. This may result in better braking performance on the Suzuki.

Both bikes are equipped with ABS as an advanced rider assistance system, providing added safety and control. The dimensions and weights of the bikes differ slightly, with the Benelli having a longer wheelbase of 1600mm compared to the Suzuki's 1445mm. The seat height on the Benelli is also lower at 750mm compared to the Suzuki's 785mm.

One area where the Benelli 502 C 2020 excels is its large fuel tank capacity of 21 liters, providing a high range and reducing the need for frequent refueling. Additionally, the Benelli has an exciting and eye-catching design, which may appeal to riders looking for a visually striking bike.

Suzuki SV 650 2021

Suzuki SV 650 2021

On the other hand, the Suzuki SV 650 2021 offers a confident V2 powerplant with character, providing a unique riding experience. The stable chassis and comfortable seating position make it a suitable choice for longer rides. The Suzuki also boasts easy handling and a timeless look.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Benelli 502 C 2020 has a hard chassis, which may result in a less comfortable ride. The TFT display on the Benelli also lacks functions, limiting its usability. Additionally, the pillion saddle on the Benelli is relatively small, potentially compromising the comfort of passengers.

The Suzuki SV 650 2021 has a brake that requires manual force, which may be less convenient for some riders. It also lacks additional electronics apart from ABS, and the instruments are moderately readable, potentially affecting the overall user experience.

In conclusion, the Suzuki SV 650 2021 offers superior engine power, a stable chassis, and a comfortable seating position. The Benelli 502 C 2020, on the other hand, has a larger fuel tank capacity and a visually appealing design. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Benelli 502 C 2020 compared to Suzuki SV 650 2021

Benelli 502 C 2020
Suzuki SV 650 2021
Show all
Same only
Differences
Benelli 502 C 2020
Benelli 502 C 2020
Suzuki SV 650 2021
Suzuki SV 650 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeV
BoreBore69 mmBore81 mm
StrokeStroke66.8 mmStroke62.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power48 HPEngine power73 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque45 NmTorque64 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,000 rpmRpm at Torque6,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio11.2
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement500 ccmDisplacement645 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel125 mmTravel125 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel50 mmTravel130 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentPreload
MaterialMaterialSteelMaterialSteel

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter280 mmDiameter290 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter240 mmDiameter240 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,280 mmLength2,140 mm
WidthWidth940 mmWidth760 mm
HeightHeight1,140 mmHeight1,090 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,600 mmWheelbase1,445 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height750 mmSeat Height785 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)217 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)200 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity21 lFuel Tank Capacity14.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2, A

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Benelli 502 C 2020

Benelli 502 C 2020

The Benelli 502 C is definitely an exciting phenomenon in the A2 cruiser class. With a very familiar look and a pleasant two-cylinder, it is an exciting alternative to the top dogs in this class. Thanks to the large fuel tank, it could actually be a good long-distance motorbike if the suspension set-up were not chosen too harshly. Moreover, it is impossible to take a passenger with a clear conscience, as he or she will be clinging for dear life to the small seat for the entire ride. However, if you only plan rides alone and want to be as conspicuous as possible, the Benelli 502 C is perfect. Plenty of motorbike for A2 riders!

pleasant engine

low seat height of 750 mm

large tank

high range

exciting looks

Hard chassis

few functions in the TFT display

too small pillion saddle

Suzuki SV 650 2021

Suzuki SV 650 2021

Not much has changed on the Suzuki SV 650 compared to its predecessor, five years ago. The engine has been updated to Euro5 and is now even more mature, which fits in perfectly with the rest of the package. The SV 650 doesn't want to scare anyone, especially beginners. The chassis makes a solid, unagitated impression, the brakes require a lot of manual force to prevent unexpected overbraking. The look is timeless on the one hand, but on the other hand some components are really a bit outdated. On the other hand, the price is fair, as usual for Suzuki.

Confident V2 powerplant with character

stable chassis

comfortable seating position

easy handling, timeless look

Brake requires manual force

no electronics on board apart from ABS

instruments moderately readable

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Benelli 502 C vs Suzuki SV 650

There are a few key differences between a Benelli 502 C 2020 and a Suzuki SV 650 2021. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki SV 650 with 111 days compared to 196 days for the Benelli 502 C. Since model year 2019 1000PS.de editors have written 3 reviews for the Benelli 502 C and 25 reviews for the Suzuki SV 650 since model year 2005. The first review for the Benelli 502 C was published on 2/20/2019 and now has more than 44,600 views. This compares to more than 14,200 views for the first review on Suzuki SV 650 published on 9/26/2008.

Price Benelli 502 C

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki SV 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen