Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 vs. Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018
Kawasaki ER-6f 2009
Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018
Overview - Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 vs Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018
The Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 and the Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018 are both sporty motorcycles, but they have some notable differences in their technical specifications and strengths.
Kawasaki ER-6f 2009
The Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 is equipped with an inline, 4-stroke engine with a displacement of 649cc. It produces 72 horsepower and 66 Nm of torque, providing a powerful sound and excellent mobility. The compression ratio is 11.3, and it has a steel frame for stability. The front brakes are double disk, and the front and rear tire diameters are 17 inches. The seat height is 785mm, and the fuel tank capacity is 15.5 liters. The ER-6f is visually sophisticated and offers a safe riding experience, making it suitable for both (re-)beginners and experienced riders. However, some riders may find the 72 horsepower to be lacking in power.
On the other hand, the Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018 features an inline, 4-stroke engine with a displacement of 399cc. It produces 45 horsepower and 38 Nm of torque, with a compression ratio of 11.5. The chassis is designed for sporty use, providing a low weight and effortless handling. The front brakes are single disk, and the front and rear tire diameters are also 17 inches. The seat height and fuel tank capacity are the same as the ER-6f, at 785mm and 14 liters respectively. The Ninja 400 offers a relaxed and confidence-enhancing seating position, along with LED headlights for improved visibility. However, some riders may find the brake and clutch levers not adjustable, and taller riders over 180cm may experience enormously loud wind noise with the original windshield.
Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018
In summary, the Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 is a powerful and visually sophisticated sport touring motorcycle, suitable for riders looking for a safe and reasonably priced option. The Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018, on the other hand, is a supersport motorcycle with a chassis designed for sporty use, offering low weight and effortless handling. It has a smooth engine response and a relaxed seating position, making it ideal for riders seeking a thrilling and confident riding experience. However, it is important to note that the Ninja 400 may have some limitations such as non-adjustable brake and clutch levers and loud wind noise for taller riders.
Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 compared to Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Kawasaki ER-6f 2009
Regardless of whether you take it on the dull way to work or on extended tours, the comfortable seating position, the quiet, low-vibration in-line two-cylinder and the agility in the angular movement bring riding pleasure in every situation.
Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018
In summary, the Ninja 400 could be described as the perfect entry into the supersport world. You can't get more power with A2, the looks suggest much more power, the vehicle is playful to ride, is forgiving in every respect and still allows a really sporty riding style. Those who had legitimate concerns about the lack of power on the various 250 cubic machines now have no more excuses. Ninja 400, it's good to have you!
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6f vs Kawasaki Ninja 400
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 and a Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6f with 70 days compared to 105 days for a Kawasaki Ninja 400. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6f and 9 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja 400 since model year 2018. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6f was published on 1/25/2006 and now has more than 30,200 views. This compares to more than 44,300 views for the first review on Kawasaki Ninja 400 published on 11/22/2017.
